Search This Blog

2020-07-09

Unthinkable

In an interview, Albert Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, says he'll vote for Trump in 2020:

I intend to vote for Donald Trump in 2020, but my shift is from reluctantly not voting for him in 2016 to what you might call reluctantly voting for him in 2020, and hoping for his reƫlection, because the alternative is increasingly unthinkable.

President Mohler comes across as measured and sensible, in part because he finds Trump pretty disgusting. He's convinced that other evangelicals will criticize him for criticizing Trump. He follows his reluctant endorsement with:

I will not become an apologist for the misbehavior of the President and for what I see as glaring deficiencies in his private and public character. There will be a good many evangelicals angry with me for stating what I just said to you.

Missing from the interview is any explanation of what Dr Mohler means by unthinkable. So I shall attempt to fill this gap:
  • Health care: Can you imagine the horrors of health care for all Americans? Why, I may have to wait in line because the clinics are caring for poor people too. As the venerable Ben Carson has said, the ACA is comparable to slavery. Waiting in line for your children's vaccinations is like having them sold down the river. Think about it, which is worse? Hard to tell!
  • Homosexual people: Everything they do is disgusting. Take my word for it. No matter that they aren't harming children like Catholic priests or abusing women like Southern Baptist preachers. I don't like them. They are horrible. We should do everything we can to put them down and lock them out (if not up) and forbid them to live their lives like normal people.
  • Abortion: This, of course, is the key issue. Democrats want to kill babies! They may have come up with the idea of reducing abortion in the US by 95%, but we cannot support that notion because it isn't punitive enough—and because it came from Democrats. Abortion must be outlawed so that only rich people can afford to have it done safely, and poor people will die out of desperation, which is only right because they are the worst offenders and don't really count anyhow.
  • Conservative judges: This is very important, because it ensures that this country will be cleansed of the previous evils! They also consistently favor rich people over poor people, which is how God ordained the world to be.
  • Religious liberty: Can you imagine anyone from a religion other than my own being allowed to discriminate against me and my seminary? Only people of my religious persuasion should be able to discriminate against Muslims and homosexuals and liberals. That's why religious freedom is so important.
  • Foreign policy: Some people think you should treat your neighbor as you want to be treated. This does not apply to countries. Our president is not afraid to insult and abandon our allies in favor of tyrants, such as Putin and Erdogan. They are like kings, and the Bible talks a lot about kingdoms, so this is only right. Also, many of the countries that our kingly president insults are led by women, and this is an abomination!
  • Immigration: People from s***hole countries do not belong here. Their church leaders should come to my seminary and then leave, taking our enlightened views with them.
  • Environment: I don't believe scientists who study climate. I only believe scientists who believe the earth is 6,000 years old. I don't know any of those, but they are the ones I believe. Also, while God demands dogmatic responses to other issues, if this one exists He will take care of it without any help from me.
  • Other: There are many other reasons, too many to list. For example, rich people support my school, and they think it is important to vote for the party that favors them over all others. That is why we need to vote for a man who agrees and does a lot to help rich people. He is not selfish. He wants other rich people to be able to cheat and lie and face no consequences, just as he has done. It is my God-given duty to support him in maintaining this order. Any other order is unimaginable!
I'm being sarcastic. I doubt Dr Mohler sees things quite this way. But he owes us an explanation of the ways that the alternative to Trump is unthinkable. In what moral universe are more-caring policies less acceptable than:
  • Putting children in cages
  • Cheering white supremacy
  • Pardoning a sheriff and a military commander convicted and imprisoned for extreme cruelty
  • Taking no responsibility for subverting the US response to a pandemic
  • Calling women lurid names
  • Promoting increased carbon emissions
  • Dishonoring military heroes
  • Passing a tax law that overwhelmingly favors rich people while increasing the deficit
  • Disparaging immigrants
  • Watching porn
  • Sleeping with a favorite porn star
  • Paying porn stars to hush, after paying them for other favors
  • Extorting an ally to lie about a political competitor
  • Insisting that true stories are lies, while lying about true stories
  • Nearly 20,000 lies (not counting ones that cannot be verified, such as claiming not to hear someone repeatedly shout "white power")
  • The list is endless (I'm happy to accept suggestions for adding to it)
Sad to say, far fewer white evangelicals will be angry with Mr Mohler for supporting Trump than for not supporting him ardently enough.

To assert without evidence that a moderate Democrat is an "increasingly unthinkable" option is both ridiculous and irresponsible. It's a tactic from Trump's playbook: repeat it often enough, and many people will assume there must be something to it. Aversion to truth, repudiation of truth, once would have been considered heretical among evangelicals.

No doubt some reasonable theologians like Mohler have reasons for supporting Trump that I am not aware of. But they must be aware of how they look and sound.

It is not acceptable to throw out vague insults in defense of depravity. Have you no decency? Ante up. Give us a full justification, or convert and publicly announce that you cannot support this vile administration and all that it stands for. Anything else is unthinkable.

2 comments:

  1. Wow, Tim, you could write for The Twelve Blog ��.

    I find your argument against Albert Mohler a little disingenuous though. You start with Trumps moral decrepitude as the reason a Christian should not even consider voting for him, and that’s a reasonable argument. There’s no defense for Trump’s behavior.

    But then you continue on to list a number of standard arguments against right of center politics: conservative judges are bad, Republicans favor only their rich friends, Republicans want to deny health care to the poor, Republicans don’t believe in “science” (actually, just like the Democrats, they believe in science when it supports their position, otherwise not so much), Republicans don’t support the Green New Deal (I think that’s from one of your earlier posts).

    So, reading this, it seems to me you find many right-leaning policies unworthy of support by a Christian and Trump’s shortcomings are not the fundamental issue, just the ‘frosting on the cake’?.

    (P.S. re: abortion and Democrats For Life: saying that Democrats “may have come up with the idea of reducing abortion in the US by 95%" would be a bit like me saying that Republicans are opposed to Donald Trump and citing an op-ed by Mitt Romney as evidence. I read the linked initiative, and noticed it refers to legislation soon to be introduced by Lincoln Davis. He lost a re-election bid in 2010, so that document is at least ten years old. Since then, the Democratic party has become much more pro-abortion and, in fact, on the Democrats For Life website I see that two things they are laudably requesting from the Democratic party: “We request a clear statement from our party chair that eliminates the current litmus test on abortion" and that the party “Allow a Pro-Life Democratic Community”. Dan Lipinski of Illinois, one of the last remaining pro-life Democrats, was defeated this spring by a primary challenger who was backed by the party. After his loss, Lipinski said ““I was shunned by many of my colleagues. The pressure in the Democratic Party on the life issue has never been as great as it is now.” So, yeah, abortion is one of those issues where the “alternative in increasingly unthinkable”.)

    (PPS re: a much earlier post of yours I remember reading – take it easy on yourself, you’re not a racist ��)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey, Tom. I always appreciate your thoughts--on my blog and on most anything.

      What I am attempting to do is get inside Mohler's head just a bit. What, exactly, is increasingly unthinkable? If he won't say, then he has nothing to say, and I see nothing genuine in his decision.

      On abortion, I will probably do another post. Democrats did come up with the idea. It failed for two reasons: 1. most Democrats did not support it; they thought it gave a stigma to abortion that they didn't want to support (and you are right, they went on to become more pro-choice). 2. Republicans did not support it. To my mind their intransigence on this disqualifies them from claiming to be pro-life. It seems it wasn't really lives they wanted to save after all. Especially when you consider that many of their policies are counter to what reduces abortion. All they want is a law that condemns, and is likely to be ineffective (see Argentina and Romania).

      PS: I'll have to look up The Twelve Blog.

      Delete

Your thoughts are welcome! I'll try not to flinch if there are nasty ones, which I understand are fairly common nowadays.