He gets along with nearly everyone and is quick to take someone else's lead. Then he makes more of it than the one he follows. He's a good man to follow.
I'm testing a theory: there is no such thing as leaders, only followers. We shouldn't teach how to lead; we should teach what, and whom, to follow.
Followers give credibility to those they follow. Only on the strength of the followers' vote does one become a leader. So it is followers who determine history. Let us hope they follow those who have followed well.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your thoughts are welcome! I'll try not to flinch if there are nasty ones, which I understand are fairly common nowadays.