Search This Blog

Showing posts with label voting rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label voting rights. Show all posts

2021-10-02

A Broader Base

Before the recall vote in California even started, Larry Elder was crying foul. But he conceded and hushed up when election results showed the recall had failed substantially. Perhaps he was advised by those in his party who still want to promote another election as fraudulent. If everyone in the party cries wolf, even some of the base might tire of it.

I think there is a lesson here: with enough pressure from reality, even the most deluded may revert to acting reasonably. Some will continue to believe all the lies along with the big one that all the smaller ones were leading up to. But gradually more and more people are becoming skeptical and disgusted. And, in California at least, enough took the time and effort to vote to make a difference. Had it been closer, the Republicans might still be contesting.

Some Democrats advocate for using Republican tactics to beat them at their own game. But some of us prefer not to play dirty. We just need to show up. And we need to invite others to join us.

Many Republicans accept that Biden won the election and are (almost) as appalled as the rest of us that his opponent thought he could and should get away with overturning the will of the people. Republicans like Adam Kinzinger and Ed McBroom may be an often-despised minority among Republicans who prefer power to responsibility, but they have not disappeared.

In a choice between our country's two parties, where is a decent conservative to turn?

Kinzinger has consistently said and demonstrated that his integrity is more important to him than his job. But if he loses his next primary, who will he vote for? Who will his supporters vote for?

A traditional conservative has a hard time voting for many of the policies promoted by Democrats. But the conservative tradition also did not peddle in the lies, cheating, and bullying that have become the trademarks of the dramatically changed Republican party. Anyone with moderate political views is no longer welcome in the Republican party unless they pretend otherwise. The definition of a Republican is not what it was.

The Democrat party has problems of its own. Some members are distinctively progressive. Others represent the majority of moderates still left in Congress. On many issues, the two ends of the party continuum don't see eye to eye. Again, some Democrats want us to be more like the Republicans, with almost no one breaking ranks on a rigid set of views.

But, for now at least, the Democratic party has a bigger role. It needs to embrace a larger constituency. It needs to allow for the differences of perspective among all who have been expelled from the Republican personality cult. And we need to provide those voters caught between with a reason to vote for Democratic candidates.

I understand and share frustration with Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinnema. But if we demonize them, we are saying there is no room for debate. We are likely turning away a bloc of voters who are wondering if they can comfortably vote for a Democrat, perhaps for the first time in their lives.

If Democrats cannot find a way to tolerate the views of the center left—and now the center right—and to embrace the ensuing debates, we are unlikely to make the gains needed to undo voter suppression and gerrymandering that are already leaching votes from our base. Without a firm majority we will not address health care, immigration, climate change, and other issues of our time. And we won't gain that majority without making it clear that our party is willing to welcome and respect a broader base.

True, there's too little time to deal with rising temperatures, and we need to listen to the voices of those telling us to hurry. But if we rush without bringing enough people with us, we will fail even faster.

Especially now, as we approach the 2022 mid-term elections, there is too much at stake to vilify good people whose support we want and need. We need solid margins to quiet radical Republicans who are eager to cry foul at fair balls.

2021-01-21

By the People

On November 3, I walked to my polling place, voted, and walked out. My vote had as much influence as anyone's, but it didn't cost me much. In that sense it was less valuable than that of people I consider heroes.

We are inspired by stories of our frontier ancestors who made the long slow trip to town in bad weather to cast their votes. We can be equally inspired by urban voters who wait in line for hours to cast their vote. And it's not just in urban centers. A friend of mine in a small Pennsylvania town told me he waited in a cold wind for 7 hours to vote—along with his mother in a wheelchair. These people were convinced that their votes mattered and made considerable sacrifices to act on that conviction.

No one I ever voted for won or lost by a single vote. So whether or not I voted is irrelevant, right? Why bother to wait in line, especially if it means losing wages? It feels like our votes don't matter anyhow.

It takes millions of raindrops to start a flood. No one can say at what point, at which number of drops, the flood begins. But each drop is part of the flood. Every one is insignificant, I suppose, but together they are loaded with significance. Your vote is part of the stream, as is each of your neighbor's, and each of theirs. Significance is most often achieved as part of a group. We humans have our individual heroes, to be sure, but mostly we achieve together.

Elections are more than a toggle switch for one candidate or the other. If Trump had lost by just a few votes, I suspect his efforts before and after the election to overturn the vote would have been far more effective. As it was, a flood of 7,000,000 votes separated him from the winner. In each of the battleground states, his loss or win was decisive. This matters. Your vote and mine counted. Every vote added to the decision. The lies about the election would have been a little more effective for each missing vote.

It's true not all votes are equal. If you are from a state or district that goes heavily for one side, then it's hard to think your vote matters as much as those cast in battleground regions. But, long term, every vote matters in those other states as well. Votes from the past election influence candidates for the next. If their margin narrows, in the next election they may double down on nasty rhetoric to fire up the base, or perhaps they tone it down to attract independent and moderate voters. But they must deal with the reality of your vote.

I am inspired by people who were determined to vote in spite of the long lines and other obstacles. Organizers who told those voters what to expect and how to make sure their votes were counted give me hope. And I'm really pissed at people who claim the votes of those who paid most dearly shouldn't count. Some people of privilege complain that if voting is as easy for everybody as it is for them, then their party won't win a national election. Why do they fear democracy?

The turn-out for the 2020 election was terrific. A lot of people contributed to our collective voices, this time more diametrically opposed than in many past elections. But those elected—and all of us—need to deal with what they said. Which is why outright lies about those voices and about the outcome of the election is inexcusable.

We all hate to lose. That's no excuse for cheating or denying our loss. When a Republican member of the Michigan State Canvassing Board took a stand for truth, law, and democracy, the state GOP effectively fired him. They said loud and clear that he was being punished for not lying, for not denying us our vote. I don't know how much lower a political organization can go.

This year a lot of people paid a high price to have their voices heard. Others paid to ensure that those voices could be heard. They represent America. Thank you!

---------------------

The rain begins with a single drop.
-Manal al-Sharif

Nobody made a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little.
-Edmund Burke

2020-10-01

How to Rig an Election

 There are many facets to effectively stealing an election. If you are in Belarus, you simply announce your victory and order yourself inaugurated. But in the USA, that would not fly. So it gets more complicated.

Steps include (but are not limited to):

  1. Complain about a rigged election
  2. Prevent improvements to allow quick tallying of mail-in ballots
  3. Cast aspersions on validity of mail-in ballots
  4. Pretend that the pandemic is no-risk
  5. Citing 3 & 4, urge your supporters to vote in person 
  6. Suppress the vote in areas prone to vote for your opponent
  7. Urge your more thuggish supporters to intimidate voters in areas prone to support your opponent
  8. Anticipate mail-in ballots to favor your opponent
  9. Slow the counting of mail-in ballots and contest their validity
  10. Scream about a rigged vote as mail-in votes erase your lead from in-person voting
  11. In the ensuing chaos, urge states led by your party to appoint electors
  12. If you get caught, defend yourself with "I told you the election was rigged! Why didn't you believe me?"
Add these steps to long-standing broad voter suppression, and you significantly increase your odds of winning. Close elections in Georgia and Florida in 2018 exemplified how effective just run-of-the-mill voter suppression can be.

When did democracy become a joke?

And if you think I'm joking, read these:
Or listen to the October 1, 2020 episode of Fresh Air.